<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Regenerative communities and governance - Regenerative Europe Forum				            </title>
            <link>https://www.regenerative-europe.org/community/regenerative-communities-and-governance/</link>
            <description>Regenerative Europe Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 03:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>What does &quot;good governance&quot; actually look like in regenerative community projects?</title>
                        <link>https://www.regenerative-europe.org/community/regenerative-communities-and-governance/what-does-good-governance-actually-look-like-in-regenerative-community-projects/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[As more regenerative initiatives move from pilot projects to long-term community structures, I keep wondering how governance should evolve alongside them. A lot of projects start with inform...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">As more regenerative initiatives move from pilot projects to long-term community structures, I keep wondering how governance should evolve alongside them. A lot of projects start with informal, consensus-based decision-making — which works well at small scale — but things get complicated as more people and organisations get involved.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">Has anyone here navigated that transition? What governance models have actually worked in practice (formal boards, rotating leadership, cooperative structures, something else entirely) once a regenerative project grows beyond its founding group?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.regenerative-europe.org/community/regenerative-communities-and-governance/">Regenerative communities and governance</category>                        <dc:creator>eftychia</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.regenerative-europe.org/community/regenerative-communities-and-governance/what-does-good-governance-actually-look-like-in-regenerative-community-projects/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		